Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose This paper aims to investigate and compare the impact of foreign and domestic institutional investors on the market value of family and non-family companies. Subsequently, it examines how different degrees of family ownership influence foreign and domestic institutional investors and their value impacts. Design/methodology/approach The sample of this study includes 339 non-financial firms from NIFTY-500 for 11 years from 2011 to 2020, which contains 128 family and 211 non-family companies. Both static (fixed-effect model) and dynamic (two-step system generalized method of moments) models are employed to test the hypotheses. Findings Findings suggest that foreign institutional investors outshine domestic institutions regarding value creation. Meanwhile, higher (>50%) family holdings are detrimental to foreign institutional investors, while moderate holdings (26–49%) improve domestic institutional investments. The favorable effect of foreign players gets diluted with the higher (>50%) family holdings, while the adverse impact of domestic players improves with the moderate (26–49%) family holdings. Overall, partial family control is beneficial, while low and absolute family control is detrimental to market value. These findings indicate that institutional investors are family control-dependent, where the family control effect is not static. Originality/value This paper offers a novel perspective by addressing the effect of costs and benefits realized at three distinctive levels of family holdings on foreign and domestic institutional investors and their value impacts to witness differences caused by varying family control, which is not done earlier as per the best of our knowledge.
Panda et al. (Fri,) studied this question.