Machine learning applied to heart rate variability effectively classified athletes vs non-athletes (SVM accuracy 0.84, AUC 0.91) and identified individual soccer players (RF accuracy 0.92, AUC 0.94).
Observational
Can machine learning algorithms applied to heart rate variability data accurately identify athletic characteristics and specific sports profiles?
Machine learning algorithms applied to heart rate variability data can accurately classify individuals as athletes or non-athletes and identify specific sports profiles.
Effect estimate: Accuracy 0.84 (M1), 0.92 (M2)
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a non-invasive health and fitness indicator, and machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool for analysing large HRV datasets. This study aims to identify athletic characteristics using the HRV test and ML algorithms. Two models were developed: Model 1 (M1) classified athletes and non-athletes using 856 observations from high-performance athletes and 494 from non-athletes. Model 2 (M2) identified an individual soccer player within a team based on 105 observations from the player and 514 from other team members. Three ML algorithms were applied -Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)- and SHAP values were used to interpret the results. In M1, the SVM algorithm achieved the highest performance (accuracy = 0.84, ROC AUC = 0.91), while in M2 Random Forest performed best (accuracy = 0.92, ROC AUC = 0.94). Based on these results, we propose an athleticism index and a soccer identification index derived from HRV data. The findings suggest that ML algorithms, such as SVM and RF, can effectively generate indices based on HRV for identifying individuals with athletic characteristics or distinguishing athletes with specific sports profiles. These insights underscore the importance of integrating HRV assessments systematically into training regimens for enhanced athletic evaluation.
Estrella et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Athleticism. Machine learning algorithms applied to heart rate variability was evaluated on Model performance (accuracy and ROC AUC) for classifying athletes vs non-athletes and identifying individual players (Accuracy 0.84 (M1), 0.92 (M2)). Machine learning applied to heart rate variability effectively classified athletes vs non-athletes (SVM accuracy 0.84, AUC 0.91) and identified individual soccer players (RF accuracy 0.92, AUC 0.94).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: