Continuous low-load blood flow restriction training provided greater increases in strength than high-load blood flow restriction in athletes.
Does low-load back squats with continuous blood flow restriction improve strength compared to high-load back squats with continuous blood flow restriction in athletes?
Continuous low-load back squats with blood flow restriction may provide greater strength increases than high-load equivalents in athletes.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
= 0.99, BIC = -24.9). Well-tolerated continuous LL-BFR training provided greater increases in strength than HL-BFR in athletes.
Simpson et al. (Thu,) reported a other. Continuous low-load blood flow restriction training provided greater increases in strength than high-load blood flow restriction in athletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: