Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Social appraisals reflect the rapid integration of available perceptual information with broader contextual factors (e.g., intentions). While interpersonal distance affects both information availability and social context, how it changes trait impressions remains unknown. Over four experiments, we used a novel paradigm to address this question. In Experiment 1, we assessed participants' attributions of attractiveness, competence, dominance and trustworthiness of life size full body images of people when they appeared at near (1 m) and far (4 m) distances. Proximity amplified the relative magnitude of both positive and negative socio-evaluative impressions. However, this effect of proximity leading to more extreme positive or negative ratings was selectively weaker for aesthetic (attractiveness) judgements. In Experiment 2 (size) and Experiment 3 (spatial frequency), we held distance constant while manipulating visual cues relating to implied distance, revealing broadly similar results to Experiment 1. In Experiment 4, we used the interpersonal comfort distance paradigm to confirm that our life-sized projected images elicited similar comfort distance to interacting with a real person, helping to validate our general approach. These findings demonstrate the crucial role of interpersonal distance in impression judgements.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kristina Veranič
Andrew P. Bayliss
Mintao Zhao
British Journal of Psychology
University of East Anglia
Bournemouth University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Veranič et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09e14300274e073d45c234 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12781
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: