Highly active lifestyles in young subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients were not associated with an increased risk of arrhythmia- or device-related complications compared to inactive subjects.
Cohort (n=602)
Yes
Does moderate to high physical activity or recreational sports participation increase S-ICD-related complications or shocks in young S-ICD recipients?
Young S-ICD recipients can safely engage in moderate to high physical activity and recreational sports without an increased risk of device-related complications or shocks.
Effect estimate: HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.28-2.73)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.4% vs 5.6%
p-value: p=0.83
BACKGROUND: The safety of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) recipients who lead active lifestyles and engage in recreational sports is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the association between lifestyle and recreational sports and the occurrence of arrhythmia- and device-related complications, appropriate and inappropriate shocks in S-ICD recipients. METHODS: We assessed a cohort of young-adult (15–65 years) S-ICD patients, evaluated their physical activity with IPAQ (International Physical Activity Questionnaire), and assessed the association between lifestyle and recreational sports on S-ICD safety and shocks. RESULTS: We enrolled 602 S-ICD recipients (77% men; age, 46±14 years). According to the IPAQ, patients were categorized as inactive subjects (26.4%), moderately active subjects (45.2%), or highly active subjects (28.4%). Among moderately/highly active subjects, 163 (27.1%) were recreational athletes. During follow-up (47.3 interquartile range, 27.0–67.6 months), 23 patients (3.8%) reached the safety end point of arrhythmia- or device-related complications, with moderately and highly active subjects showing in multivariate analysis similar incidence compared with inactive subjects ( P =0.59 and P =0.83, respectively). Forty-four patients had 87 appropriate shocks. In multivariate analysis, moderately and highly active subjects showed a nonsignificantly lower incidence of appropriate shocks compared with inactive subjects ( P =0.12 and P =0.11, respectively). Consistently, there was a nonsignificant lower incidence of appropriate shocks in athletes versus nonathletes ( P =0.06). Thirty-nine patients had 46 inappropriate shocks. Moderately and highly active subjects had similar incidence of inappropriate shocks compared with inactive subjects ( P =0.92 and P =0.88, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Young S-ICD patients often lead active lifestyles and participate in sports. Higher activity levels were not associated with increased implantable cardioverter defibrillator–related complications or increased risk of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks.
Francia et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) recipients (n=602). High physical activity vs. Inactivity was evaluated on Arrhythmia- or device-related complications (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.28-2.73, p=0.83). Highly active lifestyles in young subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients were not associated with an increased risk of arrhythmia- or device-related complications compared to inactive subjects.