Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in kidney transplant patients resulted in a 6.3% periprocedural complication rate, identical to matched non-transplant controls, without negatively impacting kidney function.
Cohort (n=64)
Yes
Atrial fibrillation in kidney transplant patients (n=64)
Catheter ablation vs Non-transplant patients undergoing catheter ablation
Composite of procedure-related complications, p=1
Absolute Event Rate: 6.3% vs 6.3%
p-value: p=1
Abstract Introduction Managing atrial fibrillation in kidney transplant patients poses a challenge for both nephrologists and cardiologists. Data regarding the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation in this patient’s cohort is scarce. Methods and results In this two-center prospective study, we included all consecutive kidney transplant patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation between April 2017 and March 2022. A 1:3 propensity score matching created a control group of non-transplant AF patients undergoing ablation. We included 16 kidney transplant patients and 48 matched controls. Ablation was successful in all patients. The periprocedural complication rate (6.3% in the kidney transplant group vs. 6.3% in the control group, p value = 1) did not differ between the two groups. One transplant patient experienced graft dysfunction after a complication. At 18 months, AF recurrence-fee rates were 69% in the transplant group and 70.1% in controls ( p = 0.95). By the last follow-up, all transplant patients had discontinued antiarrhythmic drugs, while 19.6% of the patients in the control group were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs ( p = 0.09). Kidney function in the transplant group remained stable (eGFR 32 23.8, 40.5 ml/min/1.73 m 2 before vs. 34 29.8, 38 ml/min/1.73 m 2 at last follow up, p = 0.93). Conclusions This study demonstrates that catheter ablation is a viable option for treating AF in kidney transplant patients, with comparable outcomes to non-transplanted individuals. Discontinuing antiarrhythmic drugs reduces drug interaction risks, but minimizing procedural complications remains critical to preserving graft function. Graphical Abstract
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
K. Ahmad
State University of Makassar
Lorenzo Bartoli
Electrophysiology
Alessio Gasperetti
Electrophysiology
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Johns Hopkins University
University of Bologna
University of Lübeck
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ahmad et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation in kidney transplant patients (n=64). Catheter ablation vs. Non-transplant patients undergoing catheter ablation was evaluated on Composite of procedure-related complications (p=1). Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in kidney transplant patients resulted in a 6.3% periprocedural complication rate, identical to matched non-transplant controls, without negatively impacting kidney function.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a098dea87ad1657d2517282 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02006-x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: