Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In October of 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration finalized regulations establishing the category of self-fitting over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids, intended to reduce barriers to hearing aid adoption for individuals with self-perceived mild to moderate hearing loss. Since then a number of self-fitting OTC hearing aids have entered the market, and a small number of published studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of a self-fitted OTC intervention against a traditional clinician-fitted intervention. Given the variety of self-fitting approaches available, and the small number of studies demonstrating effectiveness, the goal of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially available self-fitting OTC hearing aid intervention against a clinician-fitted intervention. Consistent with previous studies, we found that the self-fitted intervention was not inferior to the clinician-fitted intervention for self-reported benefit and objective speech-in-noise outcomes. We found statistically significant improvements in self-fitted outcomes compared to clinician-fitted outcomes, though deviations from best audiological practices in our clinician-fitted intervention may have influenced our results. In addition to presenting our results, we discuss the state of evaluating the noninferiority of self-fitted interventions and offer some new perspectives.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lucas S. Baltzell
Boston University
Kostas Kokkinakis
Leco Corporation (United States)
Anying Li
Central South University
Trends in Hearing
University of Minnesota
Twin Cities Orthopedics
San Jose State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Baltzell et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d7d301024216094056e92 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165251328055
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: