This review provides a comprehensive overview of the promises, pitfalls, current delivery systems, and translational challenges associated with the oral administration of biologics.
This review highlights the advancements and challenges in developing oral delivery systems for nucleic acid and protein therapeutics.
The development of nucleic acid and protein drugs for oral delivery has lagged behind their production for conventional nonoral routes. Over the past decade, the evolution of DNA- and RNA-based technologies combined with the innovation of state-of-the-art delivery vehicles for nucleic acids has brought rapid advancements to the biopharmaceutical field. Nucleic acid therapies have the potential to achieve long-lasting effects, or even cures, by inhibiting or editing genes, which is not possible with conventional small-molecule drugs. However, challenges and limitations must be addressed before these therapies can provide cures for chronic conditions and rare diseases, rather than only offering temporary relief. Nucleic acids and proteins face premature degradation in the acidic, enzyme-rich stomach environment and are rapidly cleared by the liver. To overcome these challenges, various delivery vehicles have been developed to transport therapeutic compounds to the intestines, where the active compounds are released and gut microbiota and mucosal immune system also play an important role. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the promises and pitfalls associated with the oral route of administration of biologics, current delivery systems, applications of orally delivered therapeutics, and the challenges and considerations for translation of nucleic acid and protein therapeutics into clinical practice.
Ding et al. (Tue,) conducted a review in Oral delivery of biologics. Oral delivery of biologics (nucleic acids and proteins) was evaluated. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the promises, pitfalls, current delivery systems, and translational challenges associated with the oral administration of biologics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: