Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVES: Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in biomedical applications, leading to efforts to fine-tune them on domain-specific data. However, the effectiveness of this approach remains unclear. This study aims to critically evaluate the performance of biomedically fine-tuned LLMs against their general-purpose counterparts across a range of clinical tasks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the performance of biomedically fine-tuned LLMs against their general-purpose counterparts on clinical case challenges from NEJM and JAMA, and on multiple clinical tasks, such as information extraction, document summarization and clinical coding. We used a diverse set of benchmarks specifically chosen to be outside the likely fine-tuning datasets of biomedical models, ensuring a fair assessment of generalization capabilities. RESULTS: Biomedical LLMs generally underperformed compared to general-purpose models, especially on tasks not focused on probing medical knowledge. While on the case challenges, larger biomedical and general-purpose models showed similar performance (eg, OpenBioLLM-70B: 66.4% vs Llama-3-70B-Instruct: 65% on JAMA), smaller biomedical models showed more pronounced underperformance (OpenBioLLM-8B: 30% vs Llama-3-8B-Instruct: 64.3% on NEJM). Similar trends appeared across CLUE benchmarks, with general-purpose models often achieving higher scores in text generation, question answering, and coding. Notably, biomedical LLMs also showed a higher tendency to hallucinate. DISCUSSION: Our findings challenge the assumption that biomedical fine-tuning inherently improves LLM performance, as general-purpose models consistently performed better on unseen medical tasks. Retrieval-augmented generation may offer a more effective strategy for clinical adaptation. CONCLUSION: Fine-tuning LLMs on biomedical data may not yield the anticipated benefits. Alternative approaches, such as retrieval augmentation, should be further explored for effective and reliable clinical integration of LLMs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Felix J. Dorfner
Amin Dada
Felix Busch
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Harvard University
University of California, San Francisco
Massachusetts General Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dorfner et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0032a94716aad0cc859c61 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf045
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: