Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Drawing on critically oriented principles, we invite policymakers and practitioners to extend traditional commitments to bridging the gap between research and policy and practice. To achieve this goal, we move beyond hegemonic norms that privilege traditional forms of research and instead adopt a more inclusive and expansive emphasis on knowledge. Furthermore, we introduce critical praxis as a way to reframe engagement with knowledge as a critical, reflective, ongoing practice that challenges traditional power dynamics and comes with a sense of responsibility to and relationality with various stakeholders in ways that knowledge “use” or “brokering” cannot fully capture. Policymakers and practitioners can turn to this framework as a guide to promote equity in a range of areas of education policy and practice.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Raquel Muñiz
Boston College
Wilson Kwamogi Okello
Pennsylvania State University
Maria M. Lewis
Educational Researcher
Pennsylvania State University
Boston College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Muñiz et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12044d0f30cc37a9b4c622 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x251333699
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: