Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background/Aim: This study investigated the therapeutic potential of lipophosphonoxin (LPPO), an antibacterial agent, loaded into polycaprolactone nanofiber dressings (NANO-LPPO) for full-thickness wound healing. Using a porcine model, we aimed to assess the impact of areal weight of the dressing (10, 20 and 30 g/m2) on wound-healing outcomes and validate findings from previous murine studies. Materials and Methods: Full-thickness wounds were created on porcine skin and treated with the NANO-LPPO dressings of differing thickness. Positive control (Aquacel Ag+) and standard control (Jelonet) groups were included for comparison. Wound-healing progression was evaluated macroscopically and on the histological level. Results: Macroscopic observations indicated no signs of infection in any group, with wounds covered by scabs by day 14. Thicker dressings (areal weights of 30 and 20 g/m2) demonstrated superior performance in promoting the formation of granulation tissue and healing compared to the thinner version (areal weight of 10 g/m2). LPPO-loading enhanced scaffold wettability and biodegradability without impairing healing outcomes. Both control groups exhibited similar healing characteristics. Conclusion: The findings underscore the importance of optimizing dressing thickness for effective wound healing. NANO-LPPO dressings exhibit translational potential as a therapeutic option for full-thickness wounds, warranting further preclinical and regulatory evaluation to support clinical application.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hubert Šuca
University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Štefan Juhás
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics
Jana Juhásová
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics
In Vivo
Comenius University Bratislava
University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Šuca et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1b5a0a39ea7417dc42bd29 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13937