Gastric bypass was associated with a lower risk of 4-point MACE compared to sleeve gastrectomy (1.9% vs 3.0%; HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.64-0.88) over a median follow-up of 5.1 years.
Cohort (n=39,067)
Does gastric bypass reduce 4-point MACE compared to sleeve gastrectomy in adults undergoing bariatric surgery for obesity?
39,067 adults undergoing gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy for obesity treatment, median age 42, 73.1% women, based in Switzerland.
Gastric bypass
Sleeve gastrectomy
4-point MACE (acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hospitalizations for heart failure, and all-cause mortality) over a median follow-up of 5.1 yearscomposite
Gastric bypass is associated with a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiac events compared to sleeve gastrectomy in adults with obesity, primarily driven by a reduction in acute myocardial infarction.
Effect estimate: HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.88)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.9% vs 3%
Importance: Metabolic bariatric surgery is the most effective and durable treatment for weight loss and improvement of cardiovascular diseases. With sleeve gastrectomy now surpassing gastric bypass as the most common procedure worldwide, comparing these procedures' associations with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is needed. Objective: To compare the risk of MACE among individuals undergoing gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, inverse probability-weighted cohort study was conducted using administrative claims data from Switzerland among adults undergoing gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy for obesity treatment between January 2012 and December 2022. Inpatient individuals with a primary or secondary discharge procedure code for gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed from April 2024 to September 2025. Exposure: Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: A weighted cohort was analyzed to study the primary outcome of 4-point MACE, including acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hospitalizations for heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of MACE, surgical reinterventions, and associated complications. Results: Of 39 067 patients, 30 270 patients (77.5%) underwent gastric bypass and 8798 patients (22.5%) underwent sleeve gastrectomy. Median (IQR) patient age was 42 (35-50) years, and 28 560 patients (73.1%) were women. A total of 23 708 patients (60.7%) had a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 40 or higher. After weighting, over a median (IQR) follow-up of 5.1 years (2.6-7.6), the primary outcome occurred in 577 patients in the gastric bypass group (1.9%) and 264 patients in the sleeve gastrectomy group (3.0%), with incidence rates of 3.96 and 5.10 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64-0.88). This difference was primarily driven by lower rates of acute myocardial infarction (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.86). No differences were observed in ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Both short- and long-term secondary outcomes favored gastric bypass over sleeve gastrectomy, except for higher rates of revision surgery and immediate postoperative complications. Conclusions and relevance: In this inverse probability-weighted cohort study, for patients undergoing metabolic bariatric surgery, gastric bypass was associated with lower rates of MACE than sleeve gastrectomy over a follow-up period of up to 11 years. Known postoperative complications were confirmed for both gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Simone Wildisen
Kantonsspital Aarau
Rahel Laager
University of Lucerne
Tristan Struja
University of Basel
JAMA Surgery
Harvard University
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wildisen et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in Obesity (n=39,067). Gastric bypass vs. Sleeve gastrectomy was evaluated on 4-point MACE, including acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hospitalizations for heart failure, and all-cause mortality (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.88). Gastric bypass was associated with a lower risk of 4-point MACE compared to sleeve gastrectomy (1.9% vs 3.0%; HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.64-0.88) over a median follow-up of 5.1 years.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12be4c257f24f1de9e36ca — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1065
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: