Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in technical and engineering higher education presents both unprecedented opportunities and significant challenges. This study investigates how disciplinary characteristics, cultural contexts and institutional readiness influence AI implementation success in higher education. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes AI integration in higher education through a dual methodological approach combining systematic literature review and ethnographic observations across different institutes and then proposes a multilevel integration framework that addresses implementation challenges across institutional, departmental and course-specific levels. Findings The study identifies three distinct approaches to AI integration in assessment: AI-inclusive assessment design, case study-based resistance strategies and hybrid examination models. The bibliometric analysis reveals ChatGPT as the dominant focus in current AI education research. The analysis identifies critical dialectical tensions that shape the integration of AI within higher education assessment practices – namely, the Authenticity–Innovation Paradox (balancing authentic assessment with AI-driven innovation), the Competency–Augmentation Dilemma (preserving core skills amid AI support) and the Scale–Customization Conflict (reconciling scalable models with personalized learning needs). The findings suggest that effective AI integration necessitates a shift from isolated individual innovations to coordinated, institution-wide strategies, conceptualized as “structured flexibility frameworks,” while acknowledging significant regional and cultural variations in implementation approaches worldwide. Originality/value This study makes several significant contributions to AI integration in technical and engineering higher education. First, it develops a comprehensive multilevel framework that links institutional strategy, departmental approaches and classroom practices, addressing the complex dynamics of AI implementation. Through ethnographic observations across multiple Australian universities, the study provides empirical evidence of successful adaptation strategies, documenting real-world outcomes. Finally, the research establishes a theoretical foundation for understanding how disciplinary and cultural factors influence AI implementation success, providing insights into why certain approaches succeed or fail in different educational contexts. This work advances both theoretical understanding and practical strategies for AI integration in diverse higher education settings.
Abbasnejad et al. (Tue,) studied this question.