Analyzing cell-to-cell heterogeneities and cell configurations in parallel-connected battery modules using physics-based modeling

In parallel-connected cells, cell-to-cell (CtC) heterogeneities can lead to current and thermal gradients that may adversely impact the battery performance and aging. Sources of CtC heterogeneity include manufacturing process tolerances, poor module configurations, and inadequate thermal management. Understanding which CtC heterogeneity sources most significantly impact battery performance is crucial, as it can provide valuable insights. In this study, we use an experimentally validated electrochemical battery model to simulate hundreds of battery configurations, each consisting of four cells in parallel. We conduct a statistical analysis to evaluate the relative importance of key cell-level parameters, interconnection resistance, cell spacing, and location on performance and aging. The analysis reveals that heterogeneities in electrode active material volume fractions primarily impact module capacity, energy, and cell current, leading to substantial thermal gradients. However, to fully capture the output behavior, interconnection resistance, state of charge gradients and the effect of the temperature on parameter values must also be considered. Additionally, module design configurations, particularly cell location, exacerbate thermal gradients, accelerating long-term module degradation. This study also offers insights into optimizing cell arrangement during module design to reduce thermal gradients and enhance overall battery performance and longevity. Simulation results with four cells indicate a reduction of 51.8% in thermal gradients, leading to a 5.2% decrease in long-term energy loss. • CtC variation effects are studied using physics-based models and statistical methods • Electrode active material changes drive battery module capacity and energy variation • CtC thermal gradients are exacerbated by interconnection resistance and module layout • A simple arrangement strategy reduces the module thermal gradients by 51.8% • The cell arrangement strategy lowers module energy loss by 5.2% after 500 cycles