Does an AI-based preoperative frailty index predict postoperative outcomes in older surgical patients?
An AI-based preoperative frailty index using EHR data effectively predicts 30-day mortality, length of stay, and discharge disposition in older surgical patients.
BACKGROUND: Preoperative frailty assessment is crucial for surgical risk stratification in older adults. Traditional frailty measurements are often too time-consuming and resource-intensive in preoperative settings. This study aimed to externally validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based frailty index developed using electronic health records (EHR). METHODS: We externally validated an AI-based frailty index, previously developed by our team, on a cohort of 1 52 364 surgical patients aged 65+ years from the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. We examined the association between the predicted frailty and three postoperative outcomes: 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition. We also compared the predictive performance of general and service-specific frailty indices (the latter developed using data from patients undergoing specific surgeries) in predicting postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The AI-based frailty index demonstrated a strong and stepwise association with adverse postoperative outcomes. Patients in the highest frailty level (top 20%) had significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality (OR 4.33, 95% CI 3.91-4.80), longer hospital stays (2.53 times longer, 95% CI 2.47-2.60), and a higher likelihood of unfavorable discharge dispositions compared to the lowest frailty level, after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities. The general frailty index performed comparably to or slightly better than service-specific indices across surgical specialties. CONCLUSION: The developed preoperative frailty index effectively predicts postoperative outcomes in a large and diverse external cohort. The index's efficiency and predictive performance in stratifying surgical risk can potentially improve surgical care and outcomes.
Bai et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: