Aortic valve replacement did not significantly change the atrioventricular area difference on a group level (2.8 vs 2.6 cm2, p=0.70), but improvements were associated with lower baseline AVAD, lower age, and less left ventricular remodeling.
Cohort (n=110)
No
110 patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement, median age 71, 54% male, single-center (United Kingdom). Key exclusions: eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73m2, previous cardiac valve procedures, infective endocarditis, severe mitral or aortic regurgitation, cardiac amyloid.
Aortic valve replacement (AVR), including transcatheter (5%), tissue surgical (62%), mechanical surgical (30%), and suture-less surgical (4%), with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (32%).
Change in atrioventricular area difference (AVAD) at mid-diastole measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 1-year post-operativelysurrogate
In patients with severe aortic stenosis, hydraulic forces assist left ventricular filling, and improvement after valve replacement is greatest in younger patients with less adverse myocardial remodeling, supporting early intervention.
Absolute Event Rate: 2.6% vs 2.8%
p-value: p=0.70
ABSTRACT Background Diastolic dysfunction in the setting of aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) is incompletely understood. This study aims to to assess the net hydraulic force of left ventricular (LV) filling in participants with severe symptomatic AS undergoing AVR. Methods This single-centre prospective observational cohort study evaluated patients with severe, symptomatic AS undergoing AVR between 2012-2015. Clinical assessment and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was completed prior to AVR and 1-year post-operatively. Atrioventricular area difference (AVAD) was used as a surrogate for the hydraulic force of LV filling. AVAD at mid-diastole was measured as the difference between LV short-axis area and left atrial short-axis area. Results In patients with AS (n=110, 54% male, age 71 64–77 years, aortic valve area 0.74±0.25 cm 2 ), AVAD was positive at baseline (2.8±6.5 cm 2 ) consistent with a net hydraulic force assisting LV filling. While AVAD did not change post-operatively on a group level (p=0.70), an improvement in AVAD was associated univariably with increasing baseline LV ejection fraction, and decreasing baseline AVAD, LV volume, mass, myocardial extracellular volume, and infarct size (p<0.05 for all), and multivariably with baseline decreasing AVAD, LV mass, and age (model adjusted R 2 =0.49, p<0.001). Conclusion In severe AS, hydraulic force contributes to LV filling prior to and following AVR. The greatest improvement in hydraulic force following AVR occurred in those with the lowest baseline hydraulic force, but also with lower age and the absence of otherwise deleterious LV myocardial remodelling, thus supporting the benefits of early intervention.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
B. G. WATSON
University College London
Jonathan Bennett
St Bartholomew's Hospital
Nikoo Aziminia
St Bartholomew's Hospital
University College London
St Bartholomew's Hospital
Royal North Shore Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
WATSON et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (n=110). Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) vs. Baseline (pre-operative) was evaluated on Atrioventricular area difference (AVAD) at mid-diastole (p=0.70). Aortic valve replacement did not significantly change the atrioventricular area difference on a group level (2.8 vs 2.6 cm2, p=0.70), but improvements were associated with lower baseline AVAD, lower age, and less left ventricular remodeling.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f34b7a00258d2006cad35 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.19.25329899