Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
• Floods of 40 to 100 days suppress vegetation recovery needs over 100 day dry gaps. • Hydraulic isolation buffers fluctuations but cannot prevent extreme-induced vegetation loss. • Model residuals reveal resilience erosion not captured by static water-level metrics. • Adaptive connectivity enhances recovery and should guide future floodplain governance. Hydrological variability is a key driver of floodplain vegetation dynamics, yet current models often overlook the role of event timing. In this study, a temporally explicit two-stage modeling framework was developed by integrating a Gaussian stage–area function with random forest residual correction to separately capture water-level magnitude and sequencing effects. Spatial and temporal cross-validation confirmed the robustness of the approach under varying hydrological regimes, supporting the reliability of subsequent threshold analyses. Vegetation structure was further quantified using landscape metrics under different hydrological states. Vegetation cover peaked at ∼11.2 m stage, while sensitivity analysis revealed that suppression occurred when flood durations ranged from 40 to 100 days or drought-free intervals remained below ∼60 days; recovery was promoted by dry intervals exceeding ∼100 days. Strongly connected sub-lakes exhibited frequent vegetation transitions, whereas isolated or semi-regulated basins maintained greater temporal stability but remained vulnerable to the compound disturbances of 2020–2023, especially the 2022 extreme drought. Incorporating timing-based indicators improved model accuracy (R 2 from 0.33 to 0.81) and provided early-warning signals of resilience erosion. These findings offer a replicable framework for wetland ecosystem monitoring and underscore the importance of disturbance–recovery rhythms in guiding adaptive connectivity management.
Peng et al. (Mon,) studied this question.