Complete revascularization in STEMI had lower unadjusted ischemia-driven rehospitalization and CV mortality than incomplete revascularization (32.9% vs 47.3%, p=0.025), but not after adjustment.
Cohort (n=235)
No
Does complete revascularization reduce the combined endpoint of ischemia-driven rehospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease compared to incomplete revascularization?
235 patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent successful primary PCI, followed for a median of 7 years.
Complete revascularization (CR) at index hospitalization
Incomplete revascularization (IR) at index hospitalization
Combined endpoint of ischemia-driven rehospitalization and cardiovascular (CV) mortality with a minimum follow-up period of six yearscomposite
In patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, the apparent benefit of complete revascularization on ischemia-driven rehospitalization and CV mortality was no longer significant after adjusting for baseline confounders.
Absolute Event Rate: 32.9% vs 47.3%
p-value: p=0.025
Background: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) who undergo complete revascularization (CR) have a more favorable prognosis than those who receive incomplete revascularization (IR), as evidenced by recent randomized controlled trials. Despite the absence of a survival benefit associated with CR in these trials, positive outcomes were ascribed to combined endpoints, such as repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven rehospitalization. In light of the significant burden that rehospitalization from STEMI imposes on healthcare systems, we examined the long-term effects of CR on ischemia-driven rehospitalization and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in STEMI patients with MVD. Methods: In our retrospective study, we included patients with STEMI and MVD who underwent successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana between 1 January 2009, and 11 April 2011. The combined endpoint was ischemia-driven rehospitalization and CV mortality, with a minimum follow-up period of six years. Results: We included 235 participants who underwent CR (N = 70) or IR (N = 165) at index hospitalization, with a median follow-up time of 7 years (interquartile range 6.0–8.2). The primary endpoint was significantly higher in the IR group than in the CR group (47.3% vs. 32.9%, log-rank p = 0.025), driven by CV mortality (23.6% vs. 12.9%, log-rank p = 0.047), as there was no difference in ischemia-driven rehospitalization rate (log-rank p = 0.206). Ischemia-driven rehospitalization did not influence CV mortality in the CR group (p = 0.49), while it significantly impacted CV mortality in the IR group (p = 0.03). After adjusting for confounders, there were no differences in CV mortality between CR and IR groups (p = 0.622). Predictors of the combined endpoint included age (p = 0.014), diabetes (p = 0.006), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p = 0.001), cardiogenic shock at presentation (p = 0.003), chronic total occlusion (CTO) (p = 0.046), and ischemia-driven rehospitalization (p = 0.0001). Significant risk factors for the combined endpoint were cardiogenic shock at presentation (p 5.5 (p = 0.017). Conclusions: Patients with STEMI and MVD who underwent CR had a lower combined endpoint of ischemia-driven rehospitalizations and CV mortality than IR patients, but after adjustments for confounders, the true determinants of the combined endpoint and risk factors for the combined endpoint were independent of the revascularization method.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Miha Šušteršič
Ljubljana University Medical Centre
Matjaž Bunc
Interventional Cardiology
Journal of Clinical Medicine
University of Ljubljana
Ljubljana University Medical Centre
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Šušteršič et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) (n=235). Complete revascularization vs. Incomplete revascularization was evaluated on Ischemia-driven rehospitalization and CV mortality (p=0.025). Complete revascularization in STEMI had lower unadjusted ischemia-driven rehospitalization and CV mortality than incomplete revascularization (32.9% vs 47.3%, p=0.025), but not after adjustment.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a201baea05ff06c2ba1a534 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134793