VT ablation in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients yielded lower VT recurrence (38.9% vs 54.8%, P=0.026) and overall mortality (7% vs 22%, P=0.007) compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Cohort (n=212)
No
Does catheter ablation improve long-term outcomes in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with sustained VT?
212 consecutive patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) undergoing catheter ablation, including 135 with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) and 77 with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP).
Catheter ablation for sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP)
Catheter ablation for sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP)
Acute procedural success and long-term outcomes (VT recurrence, overall mortality, cardiac mortality) at median 36 months follow-uphard clinical
Catheter ablation for sustained VT in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy is safe and effective, demonstrating higher procedural success and lower long-term VT recurrence and mortality compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Absolute Event Rate: 38.9% vs 54.8%
p-value: p=0.026
OBJECTIVE: Catheter ablation is effective in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, long-term outcomes after VT ablation in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy are sparsely described. We aimed to compare the outcomes of VT ablation between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP). METHODS: Acute procedural and long-term outcomes of 212 consecutive patients (ICMP, 135; NICMP, 77) who were ablated for sustained VT and followed for a median of 36 months were gathered and analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with patients with NICMP, patients with ICM were older, more likely to be men, had lower LVEF, more comorbidities, and had a higher number of inducible VTs. Complete procedure success was higher in patients from the NICMP group (88.3 % in NICMP compared to 79.3 % in ICMP). VT recurrence occurred in 54.8 % of ICMP compared to 38.9 % of NICMP (P value = 0.026). The overall mortality rate was 22 % in the ICMP group, compared to 7 % in the NICMP group (P value = 0.007). Additionally, cardiac mortality occurred significantly more in the ICMP group than in the NICMP group (19 % vs. 6 %) (P value = 0.011). CONCLUSION: VT ablation in patients with NICMP was found to be an effective and safe approach, achieving acute procedural success in a noticeable number of patients using the currently available catheter mapping and ablation techniques with acceptable low procedural complications. Overall, procedural failures were significantly more frequent in ICMP patients than in NICMP and were consistent with unhealthier long-term outcomes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Khosravi et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Ventricular tachycardia (n=212). Catheter ablation in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy vs. Catheter ablation in ischemic cardiomyopathy was evaluated on VT recurrence (p=0.026). VT ablation in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients yielded lower VT recurrence (38.9% vs 54.8%, P=0.026) and overall mortality (7% vs 22%, P=0.007) compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f6a582badbc352afe23d9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2025.07.002
Reza Khosravi
Iranshahr University
Farzad Kamali
Shaheed Rajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center
Saba Simiyari
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Shaheed Rajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center
Aerospace Research Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...