Pain interventions significantly reduced the LF/HF ratio (g = -0.378, p = 0.003) and improved vagally mediated HRV indices, with higher BMI attenuating these improvements.
Meta-Analysis (n=1,262)
Do pain interventions improve heart rate variability parameters in patients with acute and chronic pain?
Pain interventions can significantly modulate autonomic function, as reflected in HRV improvements, particularly in vagally mediated indices, with effects moderated by BMI.
Estimación del efecto: g = -0.378
valor p: p=0.003
Background: Chronic pain is closely associated with dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system, often reflected by reduced heart rate variability (HRV). While observational studies have demonstrated this association, the extent to which pain interventions modulate HRV and the impact of individual factors on HRV changes remain unclear. Objective: To evaluate the impact of pain interventions on HRV parameters through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and to examine whether intervention type and individual factors such as body mass index (BMI) moderate HRV responses. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of 23 RCTs and a meta-analysis of 21 RCTs (1262 subjects) involving patients with acute and chronic pain. HRV outcomes were extracted pre- and post-intervention. Both between-group (active vs. sham/control) and one-group (pre-post within active group) analyses were performed for time-domain indices—standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), and percentage of successive normal-to-normal intervals > 50 ms (pNN50)—and frequency-domain indices—high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) components. Meta-regressions tested moderators including BMI, age, and pain phenotype. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023448264). Results: Twenty-three RCTs involving 1262 participants with a wide range of pain conditions were included. Meta-analysis of time-domain HRV parameters showed a trend toward improvement: SDNN (g = 0.435, p = 0.059) approached significance, while RMSSD (g = 0.361, p = 0.099) and pNN50 (g = 0.222, p = 0.548) showed smaller, non-significant effects. Frequency-domain analysis revealed a significant moderate reduction in the LF/HF ratio (g = −0.378, p = 0.003), suggesting a shift toward parasympathetic dominance. HF and LF showed small, non-significant changes. One-group meta-analysis confirmed significant improvements in vagally mediated HRV, with large effects for RMSSD (g = 1.084, p < 0.001) and HF (g = 0.622, p < 0.001), and a moderate effect for SDNN (g = 0.455, p = 0.004). Meta-regression identified BMI as a significant moderator: higher BMI was associated with attenuated improvements in HF and RMSSD and a slight shift toward sympathetic predominance. Conclusions: Pain interventions can significantly modulate autonomic function, as reflected in HRV improvements, particularly in vagally mediated indices. These effects are influenced by patient characteristics such as BMI. HRV may serve as a valuable biomarker for both treatment efficacy and autonomic recovery in pain management. In this context, HRV highlights its role as a biomarker for pain dysregulation and compensatory failure, reflecting shared top-down modulation between nociception and autonomic regulation.
Daibes et al. (Sat,) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute and chronic pain (n=1,262). Pain interventions vs. Sham/control was evaluated on LF/HF ratio (g = -0.378, p=0.003). Pain interventions significantly reduced the LF/HF ratio (g = -0.378, p = 0.003) and improved vagally mediated HRV indices, with higher BMI attenuating these improvements.