Does imidazole propionate drive atherosclerosis, and does blocking the ImP-I1R axis prevent its development?
Atherosclerosis-prone mice fed with chow diet or high-cholesterol diet, and two independent human cohorts
Imidazole propionate (ImP) administration; blockade of the ImP-I1R axis
Development and extent of atherosclerosissurrogate
Microbially produced imidazole propionate drives atherosclerosis via the imidazoline-1 receptor in myeloid cells, presenting a novel biomarker and therapeutic target.
, highlighting the need for alternative disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets to improve early diagnosis and therapy efficacy. Here, we observed that imidazole propionate (ImP), produced by microorganisms, is associated with the extent of atherosclerosis in mice and in two independent human cohorts. Furthermore, ImP administration to atherosclerosis-prone mice fed with chow diet was sufficient to induce atherosclerosis without altering the lipid profile, and was linked to activation of both systemic and local innate and adaptive immunity and inflammation. Specifically, we found that ImP caused atherosclerosis through the imidazoline-1 receptor (I1R, also known as nischarin) in myeloid cells. Blocking this ImP-I1R axis inhibited the development of atherosclerosis induced by ImP or high-cholesterol diet in mice. Identification of the strong association of ImP with active atherosclerosis and the contribution of the ImP-I1R axis to disease progression opens new avenues for improving the early diagnosis and personalized therapy of atherosclerosis.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Annalaura Mastrangelo
Iñaki Robles‐Vera
Diego Mañanes
Nature
University of Michigan
Heidelberg University
King's College London
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mastrangelo et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f3ee93dc238f8197799881 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09263-w
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: