Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a transformative methodology integrating deep learning with scientific computing. This review establishes a three-dimensional analytical framework to systematically decode PINNs’ development through methodological innovation, theoretical breakthroughs, and cross-disciplinary convergence. The contributions include threefold: First, identifying the co-evolutionary path of algorithmic architectures from adaptive optimization (neural tangent kernel-guided weighting achieving 230% convergence acceleration in Navier-Stokes solutions) to hybrid numerical-deep learning integration (5× speedup via domain decomposition) and second, constructing bidirectional theory-application mappings where convergence analysis (operator approximation theory) and generalization guarantees (Bayesian-physical hybrid frameworks) directly inform engineering implementations, as validated by 72% cost reduction compared to FEM in high-dimensional spaces (p<0.01,n=15 benchmarks). Third, pioneering cross-domain knowledge transfer through application-specific architectures: TFE-PINN for turbulent flows (5.12±0.87% error in NASA hypersonic tests), ReconPINN for medical imaging (▵SSIM=+0.18±0.04 on multi-institutional MRI), and SeisPINN for seismic systems (0.52±0.18 km localization accuracy). We further present a technological roadmap highlighting three critical directions for PINN 2.0: neuro-symbolic, federated physics learning, and quantum-accelerated optimization. This work provides methodological guidelines and theoretical foundations for next-generation scientific machine learning systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Applied Sciences
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Ren et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: