Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has emerged as an important tool for managing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), offering real-time glucose data and the potential for improved glycemic control. Unlike traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), which provides intermittent readings, CGM captures continuous glucose fluctuations, including postprandial and nocturnal changes, which are critical in GDM management. Objective: This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of CGM compared with SMBG in managing glycemic control in women with GDM, focusing on key glycemic metrics such as time in range (TIR) and glycemic variability (GV), and exploring their associations with maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and prospective cohort studies comparing CGM and SMBG, with 35 studies ultimately reviewed. Results: Compared with SMBG, CGM demonstrated significant improvements in maintaining TIR and reducing GV, which correlated with favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes, including lower rates of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants, preterm birth, and NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) admissions. Furthermore, CGM detected more hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic events, particularly nocturnal fluctuations. However, the studies also highlighted the need for standardized metrics to optimize CGM use in GDM management. Conclusion: Continuous glucose monitoring offers substantial advantages over SMBG for managing GDM by providing continuous, real-time glucose data, enabling timely treatment adjustments. These findings support the integration of CGM into clinical practice to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes in GDM. Further research is needed to establish standardized CGM metrics specific to GDM management.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Balaji Bhavadharini
Wesley Hannah
Polina Popova
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Madras Diabetes Research Foundation
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research
Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bhavadharini et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0621e6551bb0af8cdce8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251357873
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: