Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of structured medication reviews (SMRs), by examining the proportion of eligible patients who received a review in the first two years of the programme, and whether SMRs were associated with changes in prescribing. Design: Retrospective observational cohort study. Setting: Patients registered to primary care practices in England contributing data to the Oxford Clinical Informatics Digital Hub (ORCHID) were included between 1 st April 2020 and 30 th September 2022. Participants: De-identified data were extracted from the electronic health records of individuals registered to ORCHID practices aged ≥65 years, prescribed one or more medications and fulfilling the specific eligibility criteria for a SMR. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received a review. Further outcomes included the proportion of potentially inappropriate drug combinations corrected following an SMR. The association between SMRs and prescription changes and primary care contacts was examined by matching individuals who received an SMR to individuals who did not receive an SMR, according to age, sex and primary care practice using cumulative density sampling. Analyses were undertaken using adjusted logistic regression. Results: From a total of 635,698 eligible patients, 82,285 patients (12.94%, 95% confidence interval CI 12.86% to 13.02%) received at least one SMR during the study observation period. In those prescribed potentially inappropriate drug combinations prior to an SMR, between 12.5% and 40.0% were corrected up to three months later. In matched analyses, SMRs were associated with a significant increase new prescriptions of ACE inhibitors (adjusted odds ratio aOR 1.56, 95%CI 1.35-1.81), statins (aOR 1.78, 95%CI 1.57-2.02), inhaled corticosteroids (aOR 1.19 95%CI 1.05-1.36), opioids (aOR 1.31 95%CI 1.20-1.42), and antidepressants (aOR 1.45 95%CI 1.28-1.63). In those previously prescribed treatment, individuals receiving an SMR were significantly more likely stop ACE inhibitors (aOR 1.37, 95%CI 1.18-1.58), statins (aOR 1.35, 95%CI 1.17-1.56) and antidepressants (antidepressants aOR 1.37 95%CI 1.21-1.56). SMRs were associated with a significant increase in primary care contacts of 0.14 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.16; equivalent to 14 extra patient contacts for every 100 individuals receiving an SMR). Conclusions: SMRs were associated with starting new medications and stopping existing prescriptions compared to usual care. It was unclear if such activity was appropriate or represented improved patient care. Further work is needed to understand if these changes in prescribing improved patient outcomes.
Sheppard et al. (Wed,) studied this question.