Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the standard treatment for ischemic stroke within 4.5 h of symptom onset. However, a significant proportion of patients present beyond this window. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVT beyond the 4.5 h window in selected patients. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from inception to April 2025. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 12 RCTs were included, with 3236 patients. Compared to controls, IVT significantly improved excellent functional outcomes OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.21–1.62 and good functional outcomes OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.06–1.50 at 90 days. IVT also improved recanalization OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.96–3.12, reperfusion OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.26–3.84, and early neurological improvement OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.12–3.26. However, it was associated with a significantly higher risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.25–3.79, any ICH OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.09–2.04, and type-II parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.19–3.83. No significant difference was observed in systemic hemorrhage, 90-day all-cause mortality, 7-day mortality, or 90-day intervention-related mortality (p > 0.05). Conclusions: IVT beyond 4.5 h improves neurological outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke without increasing overall mortality or systemic bleeding, though it raises the risk of sICH, any ICH, and type-II PH. Further large RCTs are needed to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Muhammad Zahid Ahmad
King Edward Medical University
Chavin Akalanka Ranasinghe
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
Mais Omar Abu-Sa’da
Ras al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University
Diagnostics
Imperial College London
Royal Brompton Hospital
University of Hull
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ahmad et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0933e6551bb0af8ce4ce — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15141812
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: