The ‘Global model of the Psyche’, ... for a fully scientific, simulable and applicable psychology (EnglishSpanish)

Since Descartes, four centuries ago, science has had to differentiate the ‘body’ from the ‘mind’, i.e. to differentiate what is material-real from what is ‘psychic’. The psychic is not material-real but informational-virtual.Today, four centuries later, everything material is deeply studied by science, be it physics, chemistry, biology, ..., medicine, ..., engineering, ... At both the microscopic and macroscopic level we know all its systems and structures, and their progressive formation processes. This progression of continuity implies the causality that science demands. There is concreteness, a very broad consensus, and infinite technological applications made possible by the accuracy of theories.But of the faculties of the psyche and its possible structure, we know almost nothing, only effects and diagnoses are known, but not ultimate causes. There is ambiguity and huge discrepancies according to the ‘Schools’, there is no full science.Thus, in spite of how much we know about all of nature, about everything material, it is totally incoherent to ignore how it is our inner cognitive psychic processes that allow us this vast knowledge of everything around us.There is also a lack of connection between the material-real sciences and the behavioural-psychic sciences, but rather there is a confrontation at their frontier. Thus, in the neurological (something from the realm of the body) science has not been able to understand for a century how synapses work, since they are surprisingly not governed by their bodily environment as is erroneously sought, but !!governed by the psyche!!This article is a summary-introduction to the 8 articles that explain in detail what this structure of the psyche is like and how it has been formed, as well as its connection with the ‘body’ that precedes and supports it. It is what I call the ‘Global Model of the psyche’, which progressively includes the senses, perception, feelings (which includes consciousness), human thought (which includes intuition and intelligence), and the memory associated with all of the above.In this model, the core of human thinking is knowledge and understanding. Its description consists in knowing in detail the series of psychic processes that allow us to know and understand, something that until now has been totally unknown to science, as has been said. This description is called the ‘Representation of knowledge’. Nor has it been established what the ‘Characteristica Universalis’ advocated by LEIBNIZ three centuries ago might be like. It is a powerful system of natural language linked to that human Representation, and therefore strictly universal.All this great black hole of science is resolved with the articles detailing the functioning of consciousness, thought and intelligence, together with the progression of children's knowledge at the age of 2; at the age of 3, which explains for the first time the functioning of synapses; at the age of 6; and at the age of 10. As well as the explanation of the ‘miraculous’ emergence of language in children at 2 and 3 years of age. A computer simulator allows its verification.The two appendices at the end help to illustrate the scientific importance of the topic discussed, thanks to their innovative contributions, as well as the lack of scientific knowledge that still exists in this area. Incidentally, they also highlight the lack of contribution made by ‘AI’, which merely rewrites existing materials.Apart from all of the above, the birth of Elsa -my youngest daughter- and the memory -the not entirely satisfactory experiences- of the births of my three previous children, led me to become involved in the subject of Pregnancy, Childbirth, Natal tie, Imprint, Breeding, and NeonatologyThis resulted in four articles, the first two of which deal with the processes of information transfer and acquisition (such as the underrated mother-child tie) as a leitmotif, which together enable the progressive humanisation of the child and, in turn, bring objectivity to controversial issues such as abortion, caesarean section and parenting. The remaining two articles fully confirm the aptness of the first two through other cases very different from Elsa's, such as premature babies and autism.