Background: Dynamic computer-aided navigation systems are a real-time motion tracking technology widely applied in oral implantology and endodontics to enhance precision and reduce complications. However, their reliability, accuracy, and usability in dentoalveolar surgery and maxillary bone augmentation remain underinvestigated. Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024610153). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until October 2024 to retrieve English eligible studies, without restrictions on the publication year, on dynamic computer-assisted navigation systems in dentoalveolar and bone augmentation surgeries. Exclusion criteria were surgery performed without dynamic computer-assisted navigation systems; dental implant placement; endodontic surgery; and maxillo-facial surgery. The outcomes were reliability, accuracy, post-operative course, surgical duration, complications, patient- and clinician-reported usability, acceptability, and satisfaction. Included studies were qualitatively synthetized and judged using dedicated tools for the different study designs. Results: Twenty-nine studies with 214 patients were included, showing high reliability in dentoalveolar and bone augmentation surgeries comparable to or superior to freehand surgeries, higher accuracy in dentoalveolar surgery compared to maxillary bone augmentation, and reduced complication rates across all surgeries. While overall surgical duration slightly increased due to technology installation, operative time was reduced in third molar extractions. Patient-reported outcomes were poorly investigated. Clinician-reported outcomes were mixed, but difficulties in the differentiation of soft tissue from hard tissue were recorded, especially in sinus floor elevation. Conclusions: Dynamic computer-assisted navigation systems enhance accuracy and safety in dentoalveolar and bone augmentation surgery. Further studies are needed to assess the underinvestigated patient-reported outcomes and standardize protocols.
Spirito et al. (Thu,) studied this question.