Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: The increasing complexity of cancer research presents significant challenges for early-career oncologists in establishing independent research careers. Although dedicated support platforms have emerged in recent years, a thorough evaluation of the research training needs and barriers faced by the current generation of trainees and early-career oncologists has been lacking. This study aimed to assess the research backgrounds, needs, and career aspirations of early-career researchers in oncology. Methods: An online survey was distributed between September and October 2024 among young and early-career investigator (Y-ECI) members of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and other professionals meeting the EORTC Y-ECI criteria. The questionnaire collected information on research experience, challenges, and expectations from the newly launched EORTC Y-ECI community. Results: Among 301 respondents, 200 (66.7%) met Y-ECI criteria and participated in the survey. Most were female (62.4%), aged 31-35 years (38.7%), medical oncologists (69.6%), and working in academic settings (58.8%). While 73.7% had published research, 75.8% reported challenges in conducting and publishing their work. The main barriers included lack of protected research time (77.0%), limited funding (48.2%), and insufficient grant application support (47.1%). Female researchers were seven times more likely to report gender-related barriers (odds ratio 7.14, 95% confidence interval 1.14-79.22). Most (84.3%) expressed interest in joining the EORTC Y-ECIs community, with research training, mentorship, and funding opportunities rated as the most valuable initiatives. Conclusions: This study provides comprehensive insights into the research needs of early-career oncologists and supports the EORTC investment in structured training programmes to cultivate a strong, next-generation research workforce.
Cammarota et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: