Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding leads to approximately 350,000 hospital admissions annually. Simulation-based training enhances medical education by improving quality care, patient safety, and clinical competency. To increase internal medicine (IM) residents' exposure to critical GI concepts, we developed a GI bleed simulation curriculum. A total of 129 IM residents participated in a hands-on simulation using a high-fidelity manikin. Pre- and postsimulation surveys assessed demographics, confidence, and knowledge. The case involved a 45-year-old male with alcohol use disorder, hematemesis, and hemodynamic instability. Key learning outcomes included assessing vitals, performing a physical exam, initiating resuscitation, ordering appropriate medication, consulting GI, and creating a differential. Critical equipment included a code cart and moulage blood. A postsimulation debrief addressed the management of esophageal varices (EV), peptic ulcer disease (PUD), central venous access, massive transfusion protocol, and hemorrhagic shock. Confidence improved for PGY 1 and PGY 2 residents in all categories (p < .05). PGY 3 residents increased their confidence managing EV (p = .03), PUD (p = .002), and outpatient EV (p = .003). PGY 1 and PGY 2 knowledge increased with treatment of nonvariceal GI bleeds (p < .001, p = .001). All residents increased in their knowledge of timing of endoscopy for EV bleeds (p < .001). Among all residents combined, there was an increase in knowledge of discharge medications for EV and PUD (p = .01). A hands-on simulation curriculum positively impacted IM residents' confidence and knowledge in managing GI bleeds, highlighting its educational value.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marni H. Wilkoff
Emily S. Seltzer
Nicholas Piniella
MedEdPORTAL
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jersey City Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wilkoff et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a5ff54b1d3bfb60dffa8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11541