Abstract The prediction of tropical cyclone (TC) intensity change remains one of the greatest challenges for forecasters. The Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS) is one of the most accurate models used in operational centers. The current version of SHIPS uses predictors including climatology and persistence, environmental conditions, and infrared satellite information. One critical piece of information that is largely missing from SHIPS is the rainfall and structural features of TCs. In this study, a novel Hurricane Convolutional Neural Network (HCNN) model is proposed to predict future TC intensity by using satellite rainfall images and existing SHIPS predictors. A 20-year (2000–2019) satellite rainfall dataset is obtained from the NASA Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission (IMERG) product for TCs from the Atlantic basin. The HCNN model is tested for 3 different radii of the IMERG data from the TC center and 200-km is selected. The model is trained using satellite images for TCs from 2000–2017 and tested using TCs from 2018–2019. Relative to a multiple linear regression model with SHIPS predictors trained using the same training sample and tested using the same test sample as used for the HCNN, the HCNN model with satellite rainfall input significantly improves forecasts by 9–13%, 8–18%, and 5–9% for all TCs, major hurricanes, and intensifying TCs, respectively, at 6–24 hour forecast intervals. Further experiments show that the HCNN can better utilize rainfall structural information than a multi-linear regression model integrating SHIPS and rainfall predictors.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Seung-Han You
Korea University of Technology and Education
Ping Zhu
Florida International University
Oscar Guzman
Florida International University
Weather and Forecasting
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Florida International University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
You et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a78154b1d3bfb60e1131 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-24-0196.1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: