What type of study is this?

September 10, 2025Open Access

Simulation and Statistical Validation Method for Evaluating Daylighting Performance in Hot Climates

Key Points

High Window-to-Wall Ratio (75%) with clear glazing achieved 92% Spatial Daylight Autonomy in living areas, but increased Annual Sunlight Exposure to 53%.
Optimal balance for daylight distribution and Annual Sunlight Exposure occurred at 50% Window-to-Wall Ratio, maintaining levels below 33%.
Statistical analysis indicated a strong positive correlation (r = 0.84) between Spatial Daylight Autonomy and Annual Sunlight Exposure for high glazing configurations.
Moderate glazing, medium WWR, and moderate color finishes were found to enhance daylight performance and visual comfort across different room types.

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of façade-design parameters on daylighting performance in hot arid climates, with a particular focus on Egypt. A total of nine façade configurations of a residential building were modeled and simulated using Autodesk Revit and Insight 360, varying three critical variables: glazing type (clear, blue, and dark), Window-to-Wall Ratio (WWR) of 15%, 50%, 75%, and indoor wall finish (light, moderate, dark) colors. These were compared to the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) daylighting quality thresholds. The results revealed that clear glazing paired with high WWR (75%) achieved the highest Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA), reaching up to 92% in living spaces. However, this also led to elevated Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE), with peak values of 53%, exceeding the LEED discomfort threshold of 10%. Blue and dark glazing types successfully reduced ASE to as low as 0–13%, yet often resulted in underlit spaces, especially in private rooms such as bedrooms and bathrooms, with sDA values falling below 20%. A 50% WWR emerged as the optimal balance, providing consistent daylight distribution while maintaining ASE within acceptable limits (≤33%). Similarly, moderate color wall finishes delivered the most balanced lighting performance, enhancing sDA by up to 30% while controlling reflective glare. Statistical analysis using Pearson correlation revealed a strong positive relationship between sDA and ASE (r = 0.84) in highly glazed, clear glass scenarios. Sensitivity analysis further indicated that low WWR configurations of 15% were highly influenced by glazing and finishing types, leading to variability in daylight metrics reaching ±40%. The study concludes that moderate glazing (blue), medium WWR (50%), and moderate color indoor finishes provide the most robust daylighting performance across diverse room types. These findings support an evidence-based approach to façade design, promoting visual comfort, daylight quality, and sustainable building practices.

Read Full Paperexternally

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper