Abstract OBJECTIVES Mediastinal benign teratoma is rare, with surgery being the only effective treatment. Few studies reported the surgical outcomes of resecting mediastinal benign teratomas via the subxiphoid approach by thoracoscopy. This study retrospectively compares the subxiphoid with other surgical approaches, aiming to assess the safety and feasibility of this technique. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 159 patients with pathologically confirmed mediastinal benign teratomas who underwent surgery in 5 hospitals from July 2014 to June 2024. Various parameters of the subxiphoid approach were compared with those of other surgical methods. RESULTS The surgical approaches included median sternotomy in 26 cases, lateral thoracotomy in 14 cases, lateral thoracoscopic surgery in 80 cases, subxiphoid thoracoscopic surgery in 26 cases, and robotic surgery in 13 cases. For patients who underwent the subxiphoid approach, the median surgery time was 80 min (70,90), the median intraoperative blood loss was 20 mL (10,20), the median postoperative drainage volume was 200 mL (0,350), and the median time to drain removal was 3 days (0,3). Complete tumour resection was achieved in all 26 patients (100%). The subxiphoid approach showed advantages in the aforementioned aspects compared to other surgical methods. CONCLUSIONS The subxiphoid and subcostal arch approach is a safe and feasible surgical technique for benign anterior mediastinal teratoma, with a potentially faster postoperative recovery and less cost. It’s a valuable alternative to conventional median sternotomy, lateral thoracotomy, and lateral thoracoscopic surgery in resection of anterior mediastinal teratoma.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yunze Liu
Enwu Xu
Fanyi Kong
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Southern Medical University
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1b18554b1d3bfb60e8329 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf267
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: