Abstract Alec Walen develops a novel theory of rights based on the mechanics of claims and defends its preferability over the dominant position, i.e., the infringement model. Pace Walen, I argue that the mechanics of claims should not determine the content of rights by itself; otherwise, rights would be too contextual to constitute a stable sphere of autonomy for the right-holders. I further advance a moderate statism of rights, which integrates Walen’s fundamental insight that rights emerge as outputs based primarily on claims as inputs. Specifically, I contend that while moral rights are constituted by reasonable directives duly issued by a legitimate state, the state should determine the contours of rights by balancing all pertinent claims. Finally, I provide a new justification for the infringement model: It enables the state to accommodate certain weighty welfare claims that arise unexpectedly without compromising a stable and secure system of rights.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yuan Yuan
Shanghai International Studies University
Journal of Moral Philosophy
University of California, San Diego
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yuan Yuan (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1b81254b1d3bfb60ebda9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20254423