Purpose. In a globalized world where technical progress and social changes are advancing at a frantic pace, the issues of war and peace are assuming new dimensions. War, a phenomenon that has accompanied humanity throughout history, remains one of the most significant challenges for civilization. In light of the imminent shifts in technology, culture, and social consciousness, the need to reconsider the nature of wars is becoming increasingly relevant. Theoretical basis. Traditionally, war is defined as a means to achieve political goals through violence and military force. However, scientists, philosophers, and politicians should not view future wars solely as a consequence of political or economic interests. This interpretation of "war" can only be applied to conflicts of the past. The humanistic seeing and visionary nature of future wars involves transforming the essence of conflicts – from aggression to cooperation, and from violence to forgiveness and understanding. The wars of the future should focus on addressing the root causes of conflicts through education, diplomacy, and international cooperation, instead of relying on force. In this context, the development of new technologies, particularly AI, plays a crucial role; their use should foster peace and mutual understanding rather than escalate violence. As technology continues to transform military tactics, it is essential to highlight the unacceptable human cost of conflicts. Originality. A humanistic rethinking of war implies a shift from a strategy of "victory at any cost" to the ideas of "global responsibility" and "global solidarity". The new vision of humanistic paradigms of future wars lies in the integration of interdisciplinary approaches combining modern technological achievements with ethical and humanistic principles. In the future, a profound reorientation of societies toward the principles of humanism, cooperation, and dialogue will underpin stability and peace on a global scale. Conclusions. This article presents a humanistic vision of future wars, where dialogue, mutual understanding, and violence prevention play a key role.
Erin Carlisle (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: