Arctic systems are experiencing warming at four times the rate of the global average, causing permafrost—permanently frozen soil, ice, organic matter, and bedrock—to thaw. Permafrost thaw exposes previously unavailable soil carbon and nutrients to decomposition—a process mediated by microbes—which releases greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere. While it is well-established that thaw alters the composition and function of the permafrost microbiome, patterns revealing common responses to thaw across different permafrost soil types have not yet emerged. Here, we address how permafrost thaw impacts microbiome diversity, alters species abundance, and contributes to carbon flux in the Arctic. We sampled peat-like, mineral, and organic-mineral permafrost from three locations in central and northern Alaska and assessed their abiotic soil properties and microbiome characteristics during a 3–month laboratory microcosm incubation. In all sites, prokaryotic biomass increased following thaw, measured as 16S rRNA gene copy number and absolute abundance. This change in biomass was positively correlated with cumulative respiration, indicating an increase in microbial activity post-thaw. We assessed the thaw response of microbial taxa across three sites, identifying taxa that significantly increased in abundance post-thaw. Common responders shared across all sites belonged to the families Beijerinckiaceae , Burkholderiaceae , Clostridiaceae , Oxalobacteraceae , Pseudomonadaceae , and Sporichthyaceae , indicating a common set of taxa that consistently respond to thaw regardless of site–specific conditions. Alpha diversity decreased with thaw across all sites, which likely reflects the increased dominance of specific thaw–responsive taxa, which may be driving post-thaw biogeochemistry and increased respiration. Taken together, we deepen the understanding of different permafrost microbiomes and their response to thaw, which has implications for the permafrost–climate feedback and allows for better predictions of how Arctic ecosystem structure and function respond to change.
O’Brien et al. (Mon,) studied this question.