Abstract Background The Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) is a prognostic score for predicting Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT) at five years in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Some studies show that the score performs poorly for certain etiologies of CKD but not all have been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the KFRE score according to the etiology of the CKD. Methods The CKD-CAREMEAU cohort, which included all patients who consulted a nephrologist for CKD between 2008 and 2017, was used. Patients were monitored for five years and the observed event was KRT, completed by the French REIN registry. Performance was evaluated by calibration (individual approach) and discrimination (populational approach), using observed vs. predicted risk curves and the Area Under Curve (AUC), respectively, according to each etiology. Results 3191 patients were included in the study, median age 7161–80 years, 1921(60%) men and the median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 4128–80 mL/min/1.73m². The main etiologies of CKD were vascular; 1164 patients (37%), diabetic; 667 (21%), glomerular; 512 (16%), tubulointerstitial; 459 (14%), polycystic; 121 (4%) and unclassified; 268(8%). Discrimination was satisfactory for all etiologies, but calibration was unsatisfactory for polycystic, tubulointerstitial and unclassified (multiple or unknown) etiologies, without correlation with age. Conclusions Predictive performance of the KFRE score at five years varies according to the etiology of CKD, without impact on discrimination, but with a significant impact on calibration, and poor performance for polycystic, tubulointerstitial and multiple/unknown etiologies. These limitations should be known to develop new prognostic tools.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Julien Prouvot
Pedram Ahmadpoor
Edouard Clemmer
Clinical Kidney Journal
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Prouvot et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68a36a360a429f797332e679 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf258