The acquisition of high-precision spatiotemporal precipitation data with long-term continuity plays an irreplaceable role in supporting agricultural modeling, hydrological forecasting, disaster prevention, and climate research. This study evaluates and corrects daily precipitation from satellite products (GPM, PERSIANN-CDR, CMORPH, GSMaP), merged datasets (GPCP, MSWEP, CHIRPS), and reanalysis products (ERA5, GLDAS) over the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain from 2000 to 2020. The study proposes a two-stage “error correction and residual correction” optimization framework. The error correction stage integrates machine learning with statistical methods (RF-DQDM), while the residual correction stage uses ground observations to dynamically adjust systematic biases. Results show that all corrected products outperform their original versions in spatial patterns and statistical metrics. Original precipitation data exhibit significant systematic errors modulated by topography, with eastern lowlands showing smaller errors. After correction, correlation coefficients rise above 0.8, and RMSE reductions average 60%. And product responses diverge significantly. CHIRPS improves from weakest to top performer, while model limitations constrain GLDAS enhancements. This framework establishes a transferable monsoon region optimization paradigm. This study provides a transferable bias correction framework for monsoon regions and builds a homogenized high-precision precipitation benchmark. It also recommends using CHIRPS or ERA5 for extreme rainfall analysis and MSWEP or GPCP for hydrological applications.
Chao et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: