This article provides an in-depth analysis of the transformation and implementation of the exchange rate policy of the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) in the context of the full-scale war, economic crisis, and increased financial fragility. It outlines the strategic rationale behind the NBU’s decision to shift from a managed floating regime to a fixed exchange rate peg in July 2022, aimed at preserving macroeconomic stability during an unprecedented shock caused by the Russian invasion. The authors argue that this transition was not merely a reactionary tool but a calculated monetary strategy designed to anchor inflationary expectations, reduce psychological panic in currency markets, support financial sector liquidity, and ensure price predictability for critical imports such as energy and defense-related goods. By fixing the official exchange rate at 36.57 UAH/USD, the NBU created a short-term nominal anchor, which helped stabilize economic agents’ expectations, protected household savings from rapid depreciation, and facilitated continued donor and technical assistance flows. However, the article emphasizes that such rigid policies have inherent long-term risks, including the buildup of macroeconomic imbalances, suppressed market signals, widening gap between official and market rates, weakening export incentives, and increasing reliance on administrative restrictions. The authors evaluate the NBU’s gradual steps to reintroduce flexibility by refining the currency intervention mechanism, adjusting the official rate, and lifting restrictions on current account operations. Based on comparative analysis with exchange rate policies of other emerging economies under crisis conditions, the study underscores the importance of maintaining a balance between exchange rate stability and external competitiveness. It also highlights the role of clear and timely communication by the central bank as a trust-building mechanism with market participants and society at large. The research concludes that Ukraine’s future exchange rate regime must be aligned with broader monetary and fiscal reforms and integrated into the framework of European economic convergence. Strategic return to flexible exchange rate arrangements, backed by institutional strengthening and capital market development, is essential for post-war recovery, investor confidence, and sustainable economic growth.
Бачо et al. (Wed,) studied this question.