Dental implants have become a reliable solution for edentulism, yet bone limitations often necessitate alternative approaches such as short implants. This systematic review evaluates and compares the clinical outcomes and success rates of short dental implants (≤8 mm) versus standard-length implants (>8 mm) in various clinical scenarios. Data from multiple studies were analyzed to assess implant survival, marginal bone loss, prosthetic complications and long-term stability. The findings suggest that, when appropriately indicated, short implants demonstrate comparable success and survival rates to their longer counterparts, particularly in atrophic ridges where bone augmentation may be avoided. However, variations in surgical techniques, prosthetic protocols and patient-related factors can influence outcomes. Thus, short implants represent a viable, minimally invasive alternative, provided patient selection and clinical protocols are well-considered.
Javiya et al. (Thu,) studied this question.