Using a NEO-institutionalist approach, this article analyzes state-institutional dynamics and practices influencing radicalization and violent extremism (VE) in Tunisia in the context of political transformation after 2011. Focusing on macro-level analysis, it highlights institutional limitations such as slow innovation, poor coordination, and resistance to change. A key finding is the persistent triangular dynamic of regional disparities, socio-economic grievances, and unequal development at the heart of a failing long-standing governance-development model, fueling frustration especially among youths. Violent extremist narratives exploit these vulnerabilities, while moderate counter-narratives remain weak. The predominance of security-focused responses fails to address root causes, emphasizing the need for inclusive, preventive policies co-designed with communities and civil society. Effective VE prevention requires improved institutional coordination and engagement in in-depth consultation with all relevant stakeholders.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tasnim Chirchi
Khaoula Ghribi
Journal of Regional Security
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chirchi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1c32154b1d3bfb60f0f3c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/jrs20-43791
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: