This research seeks to find out if there is a meaningful difference in learning results between students who utilize the Question Student Have method and those who utilize the Drill and Practice method at SMP Negeri 1 Jatisrono. This research is an experimental study employing a randomized pretest-posttest comparison group design. The study's population included grade VIII students from SMP Negeri 1 Jatisrono, with samples taken from two classes, specifically class VIII B and VIII C, chosen through purposive sampling methods. Data gathering was conducted via observation, documentation, pretest, and posttest. Data analysis consisted of prerequisite tests for normality and homogeneity, followed by hypothesis testing using an independent samples t-test. The findings revealed a notable difference in learning outcomes between students using the Question Student Have method and those using the Drill and Practice method. This is shown by the average pretest score of experimental class 1 being 72.51 and experimental class 2 being 68.83. In contrast, posttest data analysis showed the average score of experimental class 1 to be 79.75 and experimental class 2 to be 75.85. Hypothesis testing using the t-test at a significance level of 0.05 yielded a calculated t value > t table (2.93 > 1.99), leading to the acceptance of Ha and rejection of H0. Therefore, it can be concluded that the learning results of students using the Question Student Have method are superior to those of students using the Drill and Practice method.
Dhewantoro et al. (Tue,) studied this question.