The article presents various doctrinal approaches to the systematization of property rights. The Russian doctrine presents various classifications of property rights, while using different criteria, due to the lack of unity regarding the list and content of limited property rights. Moreover, in most cases, the authors proceed from the openness of the list of limited property rights. The most common position in modern doctrine is the systematization of property rights depending on the content of property rights. The analysis of the classifications of property rights presented in the article showed the absence of uniform criteria when building their system. Within the framework of each of the proposed classifications, the authors group property rights in one way or another depending on the subject of property law, the transferred powers, the object of property law, or the purpose of the existence of law – that is, different criteria are used within the same system, which leads to a mixture of different phenomena, and this in turn destroys the whole systematization and deprives it of any (both practical and theoretical) meaning. As a result of the conducted research, a two-stage (vertical) system of property rights is proposed in the article.
Roman А. Ryabzin (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: