What type of study is this?

This is a Systematic Review study (also classified as: Meta-Analysis).

August 21, 2025Open Access

The impact of nutritional intervention and resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy older adults—a comparative analysis

Key Points

Protein supplementation significantly enhanced muscle strength compared to resistance training alone, showing a 0.45 improvement.
Creatine supplementation did not significantly affect muscle strength but improved muscle mass by 2.18, indicating its potential benefits.
The study utilized a systematic search of 19 randomized controlled trials to determine effective nutritional interventions.
Findings suggest that combining nutritional strategies with resistance training may optimize health outcomes for older adults.

Abstract

Objective A growing body of evidence confirms that nutritional supplementation strategies combined with resistance training can enhance muscle strength and mass in older adults. However, the optimal supplementation approach remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different nutritional interventions combined with resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy older adults and determine the optimal strategy. Methods A systematic search was performed across three major biomedical databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and EMbase) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of nutritional supplementation combined with resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy older adults. A total of 19 eligible RCTs were included. The search covered literature from database inception to April 2025. Two researchers independently screened studies against predefined eligibility criteria and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Stata 18.0 was used to conduct network meta-analysis. Conclusion Compared with resistance training alone, protein supplementation combined with resistance training significantly enhanced muscle strength Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20,0.69; surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 98.7% and muscle mass Mean Difference (MD) = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.04,0.70,whereas creatine supplementation demonstrated non-significant effects on muscle strength versus training alone (SMD = 0.03, 95% CI: −0.35,0.42) but yielded the most pronounced improvement in muscle mass (MD = 2.18, 95%CI: 0.92,3.44; SUCRA = 99.9%), outperforming both protein and β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) interventions, with HMB supplementation critically failing to demonstrate significant benefits for muscle strength (SMD = −0.22, 95%CI: −0.57,0.12) or mass outcomes (MD = 0.05, 95%CI: −0.33,0.44). Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251026016 .

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper