The Possibility of Unifying Cultural and Legal Restrictions on the Exercise of Human Rights at the Global Level

This study aims to demonstrate the possibility of unifying cultural and legal restrictions on the exercise of human rights at the global level by analyzing the concept of human rights and studying the cultural and legal controls and restrictions that govern their exercise in accordance with different national cultures and laws. It also seeks to analyze the relevant texts of the International Bill of Human Rights, using is a comparative analytical method. The results showed that all countries agree on the general concept of human rights, but they differ in the way they exercise them according to the culture and laws of each of them. Therefore, it is not possible to unify cultural and legal restrictions on the exercise of human rights around the world. In addition, the International Bill of Human Rights came in flexible and general terms that carry many meanings about the controls and restrictions that govern the enjoyment of human rights. Thus, the International Bill did not definitively address the issue of the difference in cultures and laws between societies in this regard, which is considered a loophole that made western countries work on the globalization of their culture in defining human rights restrictions.