Understanding the Contexts Where Clinical Supervision Is Implemented: An Interview Study

This qualitative study explores the contexts in which clinical supervision is implemented from the perspective of mental health nurses in Victoria, Australia. Clinical supervision has long been viewed as beneficial, offering the potential for increased job satisfaction, reduced stress and enhanced competencies. However, its implementation often faces challenges, with discrepancies between ideal outcomes and real‐world supervision practices. Through semistructured interviews with 12 nurses, the study uncovers the complex dynamics influencing clinical supervision implementation, highlighting two key themes: (1) projecting hopes onto clinical supervision as a solution to systemic challenges, such as burnout and high staff turnover, and (2) noticing a disconnect between organisational emphasis on clinical supervision and the realities of the nursing work environment, especially facing a hierarchical culture that expects obedience and gratitude for minimal provision. For clinical supervision practice to be effective, it is essential to address the broader systemic and cultural challenges facing the nursing workforce through multiple solutions. Relying solely on clinical supervision, without addressing more fundamental underlying issues, will only perpetuate the challenges that clinical supervision aims to resolve. It also risks turning clinical supervision into a tool to shift the responsibility onto individual nurses to cope with systemic problems. Therefore, acknowledging the wider systemic challenges and demonstrating commitment to implementation through tangible support are essential to make clinical supervision truly meaningful for nurses.