Energy poverty and climate change are pressing global challenges that adversely affect forest ecosystems, water resources, human health, livelihoods, and environmental resilience. These issues are interlinked and surpass geographical boundaries. The intricate relationship between energy poverty and climate change is encapsulated in the theory of forest transitioning, highlighting the need for integrated mitigation and adaptation strategies to manage South Sudan's natural resources sustainably. The progressive installation of clean and renewable energy infrastructure, such as solar energy, wind energy, geothermal energy, and hydroelectricity, in the local areas of Lakes State in South Sudan will improve their economic standards and promote sustainable development. The overall objective of this Study was to assess the linkages between energy poverty and climate change impacts in Lakes State of South Sudan. A cross-sectional research design was used to capture the community’s perceptions on these linkages. Yamane’s Formula was used to calculate the sample size of 80 respondents who were proportionately selected to participate in the study. Face-to-face key informant interviews were conducted with the local government officials in the energy sector, farmers, academicians, NGOs, and traders. Data was presented using bar graphs, charts and narration of participant views. The results indicate that there are linkages between cutting down trees for energy services and deforestation, leading to climate change. The study concludes that energy poverty is a driver of deforestation, which in turn contributes to climate change impacts, especially on agricultural productivity and livestock. This study recommended that the government and other relevant energy stakeholders should implement alternative energy programs, including access to electricity, solar, and wind energy. These interventions are vital adaptation and mitigation strategies in order to stop forest depletion and address climate change.
Dhor et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: