This literature review provides a comprehensive examination of the evolution of e-government in Saudi Arabia during the Vision 2030 era, focusing on digital transformation strategies, institutional readiness, and citizen-centric service delivery. A systematic review methodology synthesizes findings from scholarly studies and government reports, tracing progress from early e-government initiatives to recent digital transformation programs. The analysis reveals significant strides in implementing e-government aligned with Vision 2030, including the digitization of over 97% of public services and the establishment of institutional frameworks like the Digital Government Authority (DGA) and the Saudi Data & AI Authority (SDAIA). Key findings highlight leadership commitment and cross-agency collaboration as drivers of improved service integration, reflected in Saudi Arabia’s rise to the top 20 in global e-government rankings by 2024 (Mitchell, 2022). The shift towards citizen-centric platforms has enhanced accessibility and user satisfaction. The review also examines economic benefits, such as cost savings and job creation, aligning e-government with fiscal governance. However, challenges such as digital literacy gaps, cybersecurity risks, and interoperability issues persist, with limited studies exploring user resistance or socio-cultural impacts. This review consolidates knowledge on Saudi Arabia’s digital transformation, identifies critical success factors and barriers, and proposes research gaps, such as longitudinal studies on user trust, to inform future strategies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
M. Hammad
Ibrahim Mohamed
Jamaiah Yahaya
International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies
National University of Malaysia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hammad et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68af509bad7bf08b1ead887c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.14419/3ywhay97
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: