Psychological science holds substantial promise for informing policy decisions but faces challenges in realizing its potential. One widely recognized challenge is bridging the gap between the nonrepresentative study samples commonly used to evaluate interventions and the broader populations that policymakers aim to serve. To address this challenge, we introduce causal effect generalizability, an approach from causal inference and epidemiology, in the form of an accessible, nontechnical tutorial for psychological and behavioral scientists. We use publicly available data from a real-world psychology intervention study to illustrate why causal effects in a nonrepresentative study sample may systematically differ from those in a broader population. We provide a step-by-step guide with user-friendly R functions, enabling researchers to generalize causal effects from a study sample back to the full target population. This approach allows researchers to assess intervention effects in broader populations, offering valuable insights to guide evidence-based policy development. We hope this nontechnical introductory material will assist scholars in enhancing the policy relevance and real-world impact of psychological science.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wen Wei Loh
Maastricht University
Dongning Ren
Maastricht University
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Maastricht University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Loh et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68af50acad7bf08b1ead91b9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251359623