In the cybersecurity attack and defense space, the “attacker” and the “defender” form a dynamic and symmetrical adversarial pair. Their strategy iterations and capability evolutions have long been in a symmetrical game of mutual restraint. We will introduce modern Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) from the defender’s side to counter the techniques designed by the attacker (APT attack). One major challenge faced by IDS is to identify complex attack paths from a vast provenance graph. By constructing an attack behavior tracking graph, the interactions between system entities can be recorded, but the malicious activities of attackers are often hidden among a large number of normal system operations. Although traditional methods can identify attack behaviors, they only focus on the surface association relationships between entities and ignore the deep causal relationships, which limits the accuracy and interpretability of detection. Existing graph anomaly detection methods usually assign the same weight to all interactions, while we propose a Causal Autoencoder for Graph Explanation (CAGE) based on reinforcement learning. This method extracts feature representations from the traceability graph through a graph attention network(GAT), uses Q-learning to dynamically evaluate the causal importance of edges, and highlights key causal paths through a weight layering strategy. In the DARPA TC project, the experimental results conducted on the selected three datasets indicate that the precision of this method in the anomaly detection task remains above 97% on average, demonstrating excellent accuracy. Moreover, the recall values all exceed 99.5%, which fully proves its extremely low rate of missed detections.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xiang Cheng
Mengmeng Kuang
Hongyu Yang
Symmetry
Yangzhou University
Civil Aviation University of China
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cheng et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68af55c6ad7bf08b1eadbbad — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17091373