Background/Objectives: Tapered, fluted, modular titanium stems (TFTSs) are widely used in complex femoral reconstructions during total hip arthroplasty (THA), but evidence regarding the clinical performance of specific modular implant designs remains limited. This study aimed to compare the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of complex primary and revision THA using the M-Vizion® modular stem system. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 109 patients (46 complex primary and 63 revision THA cases) treated with the M-Vizion® cementless modular TFTSs between 2020 and 2023. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at 1- and 2-years post-surgery. Radiographic evaluation included stem subsidence, radiolucent lines, heterotopic ossification, and complications. Clinically relevant subsidence was defined as >5 mm. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA. Results: The mean follow-up was 33.3 months for complex primary and 31.8 months for revision THA. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in FJS over time (p < 0.05). In the revision group, HOOS improved significantly from baseline to follow-up (p < 0.001). Mean stem subsidence was 2.1 mm in the complex primary group and 1.8 mm in the revision group; nine patients (8.3%) had subsidence greater than 5 mm. No cases of aseptic loosening or stem fracture were observed. The overall complication rate was low, with dislocations (3.2%) and infections (2.8%) requiring revision. Conclusions: The M-Vizion® TFTS system demonstrated favorable short-term outcomes in both complex primary and revision THA. These findings suggest potential utility in complex femoral reconstruction, although confirmation through longer-term studies is warranted.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Federico De Meo
Giorgio Cacciola
Francesco Bosco
Prosthesis
University of Turin
University of Palermo
Ospedale Humanitas Gradenigo
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Meo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68af55c6ad7bf08b1eadbc90 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7050104